Not so ecological rechargeable hybrid technology?

Are you interested in buying a hybrid vehicle, rechargeable or electric hybrid? Consult our guide here:  The program on Sunday 29 November on RTL resumed news, to say not more, a source of disputes: the Rechargeable hybrid vehicles It would be more polluting than the producers do not believe. How to reveal the truth from the false in this story? Here’s what was said by two car experts and the conclusions to be drawn from it.

Why are rechargeable hybrids popular?

THE Rechargeable hybrid vehicles they are increasingly popular, as highlighted by the result of +230% sales From the beginning of the year. The rechargeable hybrid is particularly appreciated because pollution is lower with these models, which allows a reduction in consumption and therefore fuel savings. TO Difference in the classic hybridThe rechargeable hybrid must be loaded because the electric motor is more substantial. However, it allows greater autonomy throughout the electric mode, unlike the classic hybrid with which we can only perform a few kilometers in electricity.

The tests question the announced consumption of rechargeable hybrids

According to tests carried out by NGA Transport & Environment, rechargeable hybrids emit 12 times more CO2 that what is announced by the producers. Here is the announcement mentioned to launch the debate on the actual pollution of these models which, since the beginning of the year, have the wind in its sails.

The transport and the environment of the NGOs tested three rechargeable hybrid models: the Mitsubishi Outlander, BMW X5 and Volvo XC60. The models were embarked on all types of roads, with and without load (therefore in different conditions) and the final results have always reported a greater consumption than that announced by the producers.

The data on consumption communicated by car manufacturers are based on tests carried out in real conditions and with a vehicle loaded as much as possible. And this changes everything: like the batteries Of these models weigh on average 300 kg, when they are not loaded, their weight leads to excessive consumption when the vehicle only works in thermal. However, the tests performed by the NGO also take into account a complete test carried out with the unloaded battery, which explains the inconsistencies with those communicated by the producers and the interrogation of the consumption of rechargeable hybrid models.

However, the NGO asked for theStop state subsidies Intended to help buyers to rechargeable hybrid vehicles, which represent 40 million euros per year. It presupposes that buyers take advantage of the aid relating to the purchase of these models, without using them in a pertinent way to have a lower consumption.

What do car experts say?

Pierre Chasseray, a spokesman for 40 million motorists, said: “At the beginning we had the attacks on Diesel of the environmental environment, then we had those against the essence and Thermal motorsNow we arrive on the hybrid with a rather falsified speech. To each one, any use of his automotive choice. […] The hybrid is perhaps an extremely positive transition solution, to allow less pollution and therefore, for motorists, to consume less to save fuel. ”

François Tarin, publisher -in -CHIEF at Autoplus, he also expressed himself: “When we use these vehicles by reloading regularly, every day the batteries that actually have a true autonomy of 40-50 kmwhich allows you to make the house work every day, therefore, at that moment, we get on average […] CO2 emissions selected for approval. “So he added:”What transport and the environment demonstrate is that the improper use of these vehicles by some implies very high CO2 emissions.”

It is therefore essential to remember that a rechargeable hybrid vehicle must be loaded as often as possible, as often as possible, as an electrical vehicle. It is in these conditions only that the driver guarantees a drop in consumption e Fuel savings

The growing interest in hybrid and plug-in hybrid vehicles

reflects a shift in consumer behavior toward more sustainable transportation options. However, recent debates—such as those discussed on RTL’s program from Sunday, November 29—have raised concerns about the true environmental impact of these vehicles. According to some experts, plug-in hybrid vehicles (PHEVs) may emit more pollution in real-world driving conditions than what manufacturers claim, particularly when the electric motor is underused or the battery is rarely charged.

This controversy highlights the importance of transparency and accurate information when evaluating environmentally friendly technologies. While manufacturers promote plug-in hybrids as a cleaner alternative, the reality depends largely on how the vehicle is driven. When used correctly—regularly charged and driven in electric mode for short daily commutes—PHEVs can offer significant fuel savings and emission reductions. However, if driven primarily with the combustion engine, their environmental benefits are drastically reduced.

Experts recommend that buyers fully understand the usage patterns and limitations of plug-in hybrids before purchasing. They also urge policymakers to refine emissions testing procedures to reflect real driving scenarios, ensuring that public trust in sustainable mobility technologies is maintained.

In conclusion

while plug-in hybrids are a promising step toward greener driving, their benefits depend heavily on user behavior and charging habits. The recent discussions serve as a reminder to look beyond marketing claims and assess actual performance. If used properly, PHEVs can bridge the gap between traditional and fully electric vehicles. For consumers considering a hybrid car, being informed is key—knowing how to maximize the vehicle’s potential is the only way to make a truly sustainable and cost-effective choice.